Zetech University Library - Online Catalog

Mobile: +254-705278678

Whatsapp: +254-706622557

Feedback/Complaints/Suggestions

library@zetech.ac.ke

Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com
Image from Google Jackets
Image from OpenLibrary

Good formulas : empirical evidence in mid-imperial Chinese medical texts / Ruth Yun-ju Chen.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: Seattle : University of Washington Press, [2023]Copyright date: �2023Description: 1 online resource (xii, 222 pages) : illustrationsContent type:
  • text
  • still image
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9780295751405
  • 0295751401
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: Print version:: Good formulas.DDC classification:
  • 610.951 22
LOC classification:
  • R601 .C442 2023eb
NLM classification:
  • WB 55.C4
Online resources:
Contents:
New criteria for "good" medical formulas -- Textual claims and local investigations -- Demonstration of medical virtuosity -- The search for therapies in the far south.
Summary: "Why and how did the strategy of documenting medical practices through personal experience rise to prominence in China? This question is at the heart of Good Formulas, the first book-length study of the use of empirical evidence in Chinese medicine between the ninth and thirteenth centuries. The rise of this new approach to substantiating knowledge, which had appeared only sporadically in earlier medical literature, provides a window into transformations in the construction of textual authority in mid-imperial China. Focusing on medical genres and working extensively with notebooks (biji), Ruth Yun-Ju Chen shows that employing empirical evidence became prominent in conjunction with a publishing boom that enabled wider availability of medical texts and treatises. To convince a more socioculturally diverse readership to believe their claims and to win intertextual debates with contemporaneous authors, many Song medical authors turned to empirical methodology. Revealing a correlation between publishing cultures and changes in persuasion strategies in medical genres, Good Formulas offers new insights into the histories of medicine, knowledge production, and publishing in China. It also provides rich examples for scholars interested in the development of empirical evidence in the premodern world"-- Provided by publisher.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
No physical items for this record

Includes bibliographical references and index.

New criteria for "good" medical formulas -- Textual claims and local investigations -- Demonstration of medical virtuosity -- The search for therapies in the far south.

"Why and how did the strategy of documenting medical practices through personal experience rise to prominence in China? This question is at the heart of Good Formulas, the first book-length study of the use of empirical evidence in Chinese medicine between the ninth and thirteenth centuries. The rise of this new approach to substantiating knowledge, which had appeared only sporadically in earlier medical literature, provides a window into transformations in the construction of textual authority in mid-imperial China. Focusing on medical genres and working extensively with notebooks (biji), Ruth Yun-Ju Chen shows that employing empirical evidence became prominent in conjunction with a publishing boom that enabled wider availability of medical texts and treatises. To convince a more socioculturally diverse readership to believe their claims and to win intertextual debates with contemporaneous authors, many Song medical authors turned to empirical methodology. Revealing a correlation between publishing cultures and changes in persuasion strategies in medical genres, Good Formulas offers new insights into the histories of medicine, knowledge production, and publishing in China. It also provides rich examples for scholars interested in the development of empirical evidence in the premodern world"-- Provided by publisher.

Ruth Yun-Ju Chen is assistant research fellow at the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.

Print version record.

WorldCat record variable field(s) change: 650

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.