TY - BOOK TI - Contemporary debates in epistemology SN - 9781119755449 AV - BD 161 .R64 2024 PY - 2024/// CY - Hoboken, New Jersey PB - Wiley-Blackwell N1 - Includes indexes and references; 1 Does knowledge come first in epistemology? Knowledge comes first / Mona Simion Known unknowns and the limits of knowledge / Aidan McGlynn Knowledge still comes first / Mona Simion Circumstantial luck and knowledge-first epistemology / Aidan McGlynn 2 Does justification supervene on the internal? Is justification just in the head? / Clayton Littlejohn The possibility of internalist epistemology / Kurt L. Sylvan 3 Is suspension of judgment a question-directed attitude? Is suspension of judgment a question-directed attitude? No, not really / Matthew McGrath Suspension of judgment is a question-directed attitude / Jane Friedman 4 Are There Practical Reasons for Belief? There are practical reasons for belief / Susanna Rinard There are no practical reasons for belief / Thomas Kelly and Stewart Cohen Reply to and Kelly and Cohen / Susanna Rinard 5 Is evidence permissive? Introductions and stage-setting / Sophie Horowitz and Sinan Dogramaci A permissive notion of rationality / Miriam Schoenfield We are not mushy permissivists and, moreover, we should not be / Sophie Horowitz and Sinan Dogramaci Is the disagreement between us substantive? / Miriam Schoenfield A final plea for impermissivism / Sophie Horowitz and Sinan Dogramaci Some Final Thoughts / Miriam Schoenfield Permissivism and metaepistemology / Sophie Horowitz, Sinan Dogramaci, and Miriam Schoenfield 6 Does fundamental evidence consist in seemings? Evidence Is seemings / Michael Huemer Evidence is not seemings / Maria Lasonen-Aarnio Four challenges for phenomenal conservatism / Michael Huemer Preservative memory and trouble for internalism / Maria Lasonen-Aarnio 7 Does knowledge exclude luck? Knowing can include luck / Stephen Hetherington There cannot be lucky knowledge / Duncan Pritchard On whether knowing can include luck: asking the correct question / Stephen Hetherington Reply to Hetherington / Duncan Pritchard 8 Is the a priori/a posteriori distinction important for epistemology? Is the a priori/a posteriori distinction superficial? / Timothy Williamson The significance of a priori justification / Paul Boghossian Response to Boghossian / Timothy Williamson Reply to Williamson / Paul Boghossian 9 How should we use thought experiments in epistemology? How to use thought experiments / Elijah Chudnoff A guide to thought experiments in epistemology / Wesley Buckwalter How to think about how to use thought experiments / Elijah Chudnoff Thinking about using thought experiments: further questions / Wesley Buckwalter 10 Is belief a species of credence? Credences are degrees of belief / Roger Clarke Is belief credence 1? Depends on what you mean! / Julia Staffel Two in the model, one in the head / Roger Clarke 11 Is epistemic normativity instrumental? Epistemic normativity is independent of our goals / Alex Worsnip Epistemic normativity is not independent of our goals / J. Adam Carter A brief reply to Carter / Alex Worsnip 12 Is testimony a basic source of justification? A defense of local reductionism about testimony / Elizabeth Fricker Anti- reductionism in the epistemology of testimony / Sanford C. Goldberg Comments on Sanford Goldberg’s “Anti-reductionism in the epistemology of testimony” / Elizabeth Fricker Comments on Elizabeth Fricker’s “A defense of local reductionism about testimony” / Sanford C. Goldberg 13 Does common sense conflict with skepticism? Skepticism Is common sense / Allan Hazlett Skepticism is not common sense / Krista Lawlor Reply to Lawlor / Allan Hazlett Reply to Hazlett / Krista Lawlor 14 Is knowledge the norm of assertion? Knowledge is the norm of assertion / Matthew A. Benton Knowledge is not our norm of assertion / Peter J. Graham and Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen ER -